Gulf South Benefits logo

sharon@gulfsouthbenefits.com

2100 W Prien Lake Road Ste 10

Lake Charles,LA

twitter logo-blue box facebook logo-blue

Welcome to my blog

 

Here you can add some text to explain what your blog is about and a bit about you.

By gulfsouthb32553561, Dec 13 2018 01:05PM

The Trump administration is offering welcome relief to Americans struggling with high premiums under Obamacare premiums and a lack of insurance choices.

The administration has taken a series of regulatory actions to do the following:

Make short-term, limited duration policies widely available and give consumers the right to renew those policies.

Make it easier for small businesses and independent contractors to band together for greater insurance purchasing power.

Propose to allow employers to contribute to tax-advantaged accounts, which their workers could then use to purchase portable insurance coverage.

The Department of Health and Human Services also has made it easier for states to promote more affordable, flexible insurance coverage options by obtaining waivers from restrictive Obamacare regulations.

These “State Empowerment and Relief Waivers” enable states to tap money that the federal government would have paid directly to insurance companies in the form of premium subsidies. States could repurpose this money to design and implement their own premium assistance programs. Such programs could distribute subsidies through defined contributions to consumer-directed accounts established for low-income individuals.

The liberal Left continue to push their radical agenda against American values. The good news is there is a solution. Find out more >>

States also could provide premium subsidies for insurance policies that don’t conform to Obamacare’s rigid requirements.

States that obtain these waivers would be able to reduce premiums and increase health insurance choices for their residents, while still protecting vulnerable people such as those with pre-existing conditions

The Department of Health and Human Services is establishing this waiver program under Section 1332 of the Obamacare statute, which permits states to deviate from the Obamacare framework so long as their plan maintains coverage rates, assures the availability of policies offering coverage that meet Obamacare requirements, and makes insurance more affordable, all without increasing the federal deficit.

The Obama administration had placed excessively restrictive conditions on these waivers, inhibiting state innovation. Health and Human Services earlier this fall relaxed those requirements, and last month issued what it called “waiver concepts,” which describe categories of waivers the administration would be inclined to approve. These include:

Account-based subsidies. Under this concept, states would repackage Obamacare subsidies to go directly to individuals. This would be a change from today’s approach, which sends money directly to insurance companies. Subsidized individuals would get their money in accounts they own and control, and could use these accounts to pay premiums as well as cover medical expenses. The account also would allow recipients to aggregate funding from nongovernment sources, including individual and employer contributions.

State-specific premium assistance. Obamacare subsidies are income-related and offer little relief for those with incomes above 200 percent of the federal poverty level (roughly $24,000 in annual income). A state could restructure the subsidies in ways that work better for the unique needs of its population. It could offer assistance to a broader swath of its population and use them to make policies more attractive to young adults.

New plan options. Obamacare limits the choices available to premium recipients, only allowing them to use their subsidies to buy policies that meet all of the law’s requirements. Under this waiver option, a state could give subsidy-eligible individuals the right to use their subsidies to buy the coverage of their choice.

Protecting people with high medical costs through risk stabilization strategies. States could also obtain waivers to establish programs that direct public resources to those in greatest medical need. A state could, for example, establish a separate pool for consumers with specified medical conditions that make them more likely to incur large medical bills. Public resources would be directed to that pool to better serve those with the greatest health care costs, while providing premium relief to those in better health. Seven states already have obtained waivers to operate programs of this sort. Premiums have come down in all of those states.

States can advance proposals that combine these ideas. They could, for example, fund a high-risk pool and provide premium subsidies in the form of contributions to consumer-directed, individual accounts.

These waiver concepts could spur a wave of patient-centered innovation. One of Obamacare’s core conceits was that what (allegedly) worked in Massachusetts would also work in Mississippi, Missouri, and Montana. That hasn’t borne out.

Under Obamacare, premiums have skyrocketed, networks have narrowed, insurance choices have contracted, and people have fled the individual market by the millions. As of December 2017, there were 2.3 million fewer unsubsidized people with individual policies than in December 2013, the month before Obamacare took full effect. An estimated 2.3 million unsubsidized people left the market between March 2017 and March 2018.

Individuals and states have been bystanders as a Washington-imposed regime wreaked havoc on their insurance markets. State Empowerment and Relief Waivers offer states the opportunity to implement innovative ideas that bring at least a measure of relief to beleaguered residents.

Congress should go further and enact the Health Care Choices Proposal, which would provide states with resources and more flexibility to breathe life into their ailing insurance markets. The proposal would replace Obamacare entitlements with grants to states, which would design consumer-centered programs to make insurance affordable, regardless of income or health status.

The new waivers, while a helpful first step toward these goals, still force states to obtain Washington’s permission to deviate a bit from federal guidelines. Under the Health Care Choices Proposal, each state would take the lead in assuring that its residents—including those who need assistance to afford coverage—would be free to choose among a range of affordable insurance products.

The Health Care Choices Proposal would reverse Obamacare’s polarity, empowering state governments, rather than Washington bureaucrats, to set insurance policy.

Because State Empowerment and Relief Waivers must function within Obamacare’s architecture, they offer states only a small measure of flexibility. They are nevertheless a step in the right direction.

States should seize the opportunity to provide their consumers lower costs and more health care choices.

By gulfsouthb32553561, Dec 12 2018 10:47PM

Check out our December Newsletter...!

https://mailchi.mp/e960763a5e3f/november-newsletter-its-almost-time-156907

By gulfsouthb32553561, Oct 30 2018 09:02PM

Many of your employer clients feel stuck without options when it comes to offering a health plan to their employees, unsure of where to turn for advice about cutting costs, without cutting benefits. Enter the Employer Bill of Rights.

Across the country, inflated medical costs and balance billing for medical care have become the norm, leaving businesses to pick up the hefty tab or pass along the costs to their employees. Many of your employer clients feel stuck without options when it comes to offering a health plan to their employees, unsure of where to turn for advice about cutting costs, without cutting benefits.

Enter the Employer Bill of Rights, an initiative created to inspire and empower businesses to understand and exercise their rights as they make health plan decisions and manage health care costs within today’s complex health care system — decisions which affect their businesses and the employees who rely on these critical benefits. Businesses across the country can rally behind these rights and take an activist role as they seek alternatives to the status quo.

Know your rights

The Employer Bill of Rights is rooted in the mission that businesses have the right to:

receive transparent information about the costs of health care services

audit medical bills

defend fair health care payments

make direct connections with providers to achieve agreeable outcomes

Let’s take a look at the eight rights that make up the Employer Bill of Rights:

Pay a fair amount for health care.

Paying for health care should be treated like any other business expense — especially since it often represents the second largest operating expense after employee wages. Employers do not have to accept the status quo for their health plan and pay medical expenses that are inflated.

Know what health care services actually cost.

A traditional PPO health plan typically leaves the employer in the dark about how plan parameters were set by the insurer and medical provider. Businesses have a right to know the cost of medical services.

Audit medical bills.

Billing mistakes and inflation of medical charges are common. Businesses and individuals have a right to carefully evaluate health care expenses. A line-by-line auditing of medical bills helps ensure the charges are accurate and fair.

Explore your health plan options.

By partnering with an informed and experienced health care consultant, employers can discover health plan options beyond the traditional PPO model. A self-funded health plan, where employers pay for medical claims as services are rendered instead of providing ongoing and advanced payments to an insurance company, can take employers on the path toward more control over healthcare spending.

Offer your employees a comprehensive and affordable benefits program.

Employees count on their employer-sponsored health plans to be reliable and financially feasible. Employers have a right to offer health care solutions that minimize the financial burden on the plan member.

Design a health plan to meet your unique needs.

The best health plans are well-rounded and flexible. Employers have the right to customize their health plan to determine the approach that best suits the needs of their business and team. Unlike traditional health plans, self-funded plans are customizable.

Defend the best interests of your business and your employees when paying for health care.

Surprise medical bills and inflated prices are common, but health care finances do not have to be handled alone. Employers and individuals have the right to access advocacy services that support fair and reasonable health care payments and help employers meet their fiduciary responsibility.

Make direct connections with providers and health systems.

Fair outcomes can be achieved when people work together. By creating direct partnerships with providers and health systems in their communities, employers can become good stewards of health care by building bridges and driving quality health care experiences for all.

Traditional plans are not serving employers and employees

The Employer Bill of Rights is a stark contrast to the traditional health insurance experience. When employers embrace these rights, many may realize that the plans they offer are not serving their employees well and are costing their businesses too much money.

More than one-quarter of insured adults, about 41 million people, are “underinsured.” Health plans hardly cover plan members against exorbitant out-of-pocket costs or deductibles. This is creating an unsustainable burden for employers and employees alike.

Unexpected medical bills are a top concern for Americans, with 4 in 10 insured adults reporting that they have received an unexpected medical bill in the past year, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Employer health care costs have risen 24 percent between 2001 and 2015, according to the Society for Human Resource Management.

Alternatives to PPO plans are showing tremendous promise and gaining nationwide attention. The California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) manages the largest public employee benefit fund in the U.S. After adapting a reference-based pricing program in 2013, the organization saw a $5.5 million cost savings over a two-year period.

And CalPERS isn’t alone. Organizations of every size are looking to make changes, including the big three of Amazon, Berkshire Hathaway and JP Morgan Chase, who recently established a new health venture to improve the cost for healthcare for their employees.

The path to choosing transparency

Businesses can stand up against out-of-control costs by adopting the Employer Bill of Rights and turning away from traditional insurance plans, which have failed to adapt to the changing health care landscape.

One option for a transparent solution for decision-makers seeking an alternative to PPOs is reference-based pricing, also known as metric-based pricing.

Reference-based pricing is a bottom-up approach to health care charges that starts with the actual cost amount and adds a fair profit margin for the provider to calculate the bill. This is contrary to a PPO model, which starts at the top with a potentially inflated price from a facility’s chargemaster and offers a fluctuating, inconsistent discount.

Self-funded employers looking to make a change can consider a reference-based pricing plan to save up to 30 percent in costs in their first year and rest assured knowing they are working with transparent providers.

Steve Kelly is the co-founder and CEO of ELAP Services, a leading health care solution for self-funded employers based in Wayne, Pa. He is a recognized expert in the insurance, employee benefits and risk management industry, bringing more than three decades of experience solving his clients’ complex healthcare challenges.

By gulfsouthb32553561, Oct 30 2018 12:53AM

It's open enrollment season, which for many workers, might not mean much. That's a costly misconception.

Nearly half of all employees spend 30 minutes or less reviewing their benefits before enrolling, according to recent research by employee benefits provider Unum.

The vast majority, or 93 percent, choose the same benefits year after year rather than making changes during the open enrollment period, according to a separate WorkForces report by Aflac.

"The decisions you make during open enrollment season can have a financial impact on you for the entire year," said Julie Stich, an associate vice president at the International Foundation of Employee Benefit Plans.

Michael Simonds, the president and CEO of Unum, recommends considering short-term needs, such as braces for your child, and the long term, as in life insurance. "This is where being informed is important," he said.

At the very least, workers should review their coverage to make sure it is still their best option.

This year, in particular, there could also be some changes to plans that are offered and the details of those offerings, making it even more important to pay attention.

Here are a few of the things to look out for:

1. Health insurance

For starters, health insurance is the most significant component of your benefits. Be aware that premiums — and deductibles — are going up.

Annual family premiums for employer-sponsored health insurance rose 5 percent, to an average $19,616 this year, according to the 2018 Kaiser Family Foundation Employer Health Benefits survey.

On average, workers this year are contributing $5,547 toward the cost of family coverage, while employers pay the rest.

In addition, more workers now have a deductible, and that deductible is rising. The average single deductible is $1,573 for workers who have one, up from last year.

"Health costs don't rise in a vacuum," said Kaiser foundation President and CEO Drew Altman, in a statement. "As long as out-of-pocket costs for deductibles, drugs, surprise bills and more continue to outpace wage growth, people will be frustrated by their medical bills and see health costs as huge pocketbook and political issues."

2. Health savings accounts

On the upside, contribution caps to health savings accounts, which pair with high-deductible health-insurance plans, are also heading higher.

For 2018, employees and employers can contribute a total of up to $3,450 for individual coverage and up to $6,900 for family coverage. In 2019, those totals will increase to $3,500 for individual coverage and $7,000 for family coverage, according to the IRS.

The average annual employer contribution to health savings accounts, or HSAs, is around $600 for individual employees, and $1,250 for employee family plans, according to the benefits consulting firm Zenefits.

Check to see if your employer offers a flat contribution or matching funds. Ideally, aim to max out those contributions for the year, Stich said. Contributions then grow on a tax-free basis and account holders can take distributions to cover qualified medical expenses.

(For this reason, more Americans are also using HSAs to supplement their retirement savings.)

3. Life insurance

Even if you already have a policy through work, it could be a fraction of what you need to protect young children or other dependents. Experts say the policy should cover at least one year's worth of income, at the bare minimum.

Consider what's the right amount for you, then weigh whether you want to buy additional coverage, or supplemental insurance, through your workplace group plan or shop for your own individual term life insurance policy, a move many advisors recommend.

It may not be as expensive as you think. Getting $50,000 worth of coverage on a 20-year term-life insurance policy would cost a healthy 40-year-old woman about $180 a year and about $200 a year for a man who is the same age, according to PolicyGenius.com.

4. Disability insurance

Disability insurance is often the most overlooked employee benefit, according to Unum's Simonds. However, these plans can help replace a portion of your paycheck if you get sick or injured and can't work.

More than 1 in 4 of today's 20-year-olds can expect to be out of work for at least a year because of a disabling condition before they reach retirement, Unum found.

In general, plans will pay 40 percent to 60 percent of your salary when you need it and they are considered the most cost-effective form of income protection you can buy.

In most cases, a long-term disability insurance policy will cost 1 percent to 3 percent of your annual salary, starting at around $25 a month and going as high as $500 a month, according to PolicyGenius.com.

Plus, the younger and healthier you are, the cheaper it will be.

While you are at it, see if your employer offers other voluntary benefits, such as auto, homeowners or long-term care insurance, Stich advised. The firm may have been able to negotiate a discounted rate.

By gulfsouthb32553561, Oct 26 2018 01:24PM

Less than two weeks before the midterm elections, President Donald Trump on Thursday announced a plan that he said would stop unfair practices that force Americans to pay higher prices for prescriptions than people do for the same drugs in other countries.

"We are taking aim at the global freeloading that forces American consumers to subsidize lower prices in foreign countries through higher prices in our country," Trump said during a brief speech at the Department of Health and Human Services.

"Same company. Same box. Same pill. Made in the exact same location, and you would go to some countries and it would be 20 percent of the cost of what we pay," said Trump, who predicted the plan will save Americans billions of dollars in drug costs. "We're fixing it."

Trump has long promised sweeping action to attack drug prices, both as president and when he was running for the White House. He made his announcement just ahead of the Nov. 6 elections. Health care is high among voters' concerns.

Under a proposal announced by the Department of Health and Human Services, payment for certain drugs administered in doctors' offices would shift to a level based on international prices.

Drugmakers are sure to push back, arguing it would be tantamount to price controls. And Trump is linking the prices Americans complain about to one of his longstanding grievances: foreign countries the president says are taking advantage of U.S. research breakthroughs.

The department says overall savings to U.S. programs like Medicare and to patients would total $17.2 billion over five years.

The proposal is structured as an experiment and would apply to half the country. Officials said they're seeking input on how to select the areas of the country that will take part in the new pricing system. HHS Secretary Alex Azar said politics would have nothing to do with it.

"For decades, other countries have rigged the system so American patients are charged much more — in some cases much, much more — for the exact same drug," Trump said. "In other words, Americans pay more so other countries can pay less. It's wrong. It's unfair."

In advance of his speech, HHS released a report that found U.S. prices for the top drugs administered in doctors' offices are nearly twice as high as in foreign countries. The list includes many cancer drugs. Medicare pays directly for them under its "Part B" coverage for outpatient care.

Azar said Medicare spent about $8 billion more for drugs in the study than it would have if the prices were scaled to international prices. Azar said more plans were being developed to beat back the high cost of prescription drugs.

"This is not the end of the road, the end of the journey," he said. "There is more coming."

Any push to dramatically lower prices here would meet resistance not only from drugmakers but from doctors, two of the most powerful lobbies.

Trump has harshly criticized the pharmaceutical industry, once asserting that the companies were "getting away with murder," a comment that sent pharmaceutical stocks tumbling. But it's largely been business as usual for drugmakers even as Trump has predicted "massive" voluntary price cuts.

A recent Associated Press analysis of prices for brand-name drugs found far more increases than cuts in the first seven months of this year. The analysis found 96 price hikes for every price cut. The number of increases slowed somewhat and they were not quite as steep as in past years, the AP found.

RSS Feed

Web feed

Insurance definition